2.1
W
W
W
W
W
Maranhao
Brazil /
Brazilian Serie D
Sunday Sep 14, 2025 - 15:00 (America/New_York)
Maranhao vs Santa Cruz
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
Stadium - Estadio Governador João Castelo (Sao Luis)
0
D
L
L
D
D
Santa Cruz
Past H2H ▼
Note: The current season has recently started, and one or both teams have played fewer than 5 matches.
Match Insights
Maranhao vs Santa Cruz50%
Over 2.5
League Average: 41%
90%
Over 1.5
League Average: 64%
2.8
Goals / Match
League Average: 2.25
60%
BTTS
League Average: 44%
Maranhao
Brazil - Brazilian Serie D
League Pos.
4 / 8
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
W
D
W
W | 1.6 |
| Home |
W
W
W
W
W | 2.1 |
| Away |
L
W
L
D
W | 1.1 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 40% | 60% | 20% |
| AVG | 2.2 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Scored | 1.4 | 2 | 0.8 |
| Conceded | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| BTTS | 45% | 60% | 30% |
| CS | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| FTS | 25% | 0% | 50% |
Santa Cruz
Brazil - Brazilian Serie D
League Pos.
2 / 8
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
D
D
W
D | 0 |
| Home |
D
W
W
D
W | 0 |
| Away |
D
L
L
D
D | 0 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Scored | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BTTS | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CS | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FTS | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Attacking Strength
Which side will deliver more goals?Maranhao is +100% better in terms of Goals Scored
Maranhao at Home
Santa Cruz at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Scored Per Game | Maranhao | Santa Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 0% |
| Over 1.5 | 60% | 0% |
| Over 2.5 | 30% | 0% |
| Over 3.5 | 10% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 0% | 0% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Maranhao | Santa Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 60% | 0% |
| Scored in 2H | 90% | 0% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 50% | 0% |
| Scored Average 1H | 1.00 | 0 |
| Scored Average 2H | 1.00 | 0 |
* These figures reflect Maranhao's goal record at home and Santa Cruz's scoring trend on the road.
Chance of Team Scoring
Will the team score or not?Maranhao
Santa Cruz
BTTS
Defensive Gaps
Which team is more likely to concede?No conceding data available for comparison
Maranhao at Home
Santa Cruz at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Conceded Per Game | Maranhao | Santa Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 60% | 0% |
| Over 1.5 | 10% | 0% |
| Over 2.5 | 10% | 0% |
| Over 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| Failed To Concede | 40% | 0% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Maranhao | Santa Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 70% | 0% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 60% | 0% |
| Conceded in Both Halves | 10% | 0% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 0.30 | 0.00 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 0.50 | 0.00 |
* Based on Maranhao's goals allowed at home and Santa Cruz's away defensive performance.
Goal Expectation
Will we see a high-scoring game and both teams score?Over X Goals
1st/2nd Half
Under X Goals
| Match Goals | Maranhao | Santa Cruz | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| Over 1.5 | 90% | 0% | 90% |
| Over 2.5 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 3.5 | 20% | 0% | 20% |
| Over 4.5 | 20% | 0% | 20% |
| BTTS | 60% | 0% | 60% |
| BTTS & Win | 20% | 0% | 20% |
| BTTS & Draw | 30% | 0% | 30% |
| BTTS & Over 2.5 | 30% | 0% | 30% |
| BTTS No & Over 2.5 | 20% | 0% | 20% |
| First Half Goals | Maranhao | Santa Cruz | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| 2nd Half Goals | Maranhao | Santa Cruz | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| BTTS Both Halves | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| Match Goals | Maranhao | Santa Cruz | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 1.5 | 10% | 0% | 10% |
| Under 2.5 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| Under 3.5 | 80% | 0% | 80% |
| Under 4.5 | 80% | 0% | 80% |
Corner Generation Rate – Both Teams Combined
Shows expected corner count based on both teams' individual performance this season.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Total Match Corner Volume – Historical Performance
Displays how often combined corners exceed each threshold, based on past matches.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Team Discipline Profile
How often each team sees cardsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Match Card Forecast
Expected total cards from both teamsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
More stats
Team Shots
Match Shots
| Team Shots | Maranhao | Santa Cruz | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots / Match | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Shots Conversion Rate | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Shots On Target / M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shots Off Target / M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shots Per Goal Scored | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Offside Stats | Maranhao | Santa Cruz | Average |
| Offsides / Match | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Misc Stats | Maranhao | Santa Cruz | Average |
| Average Possession | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Draw % FT | 30% | 0% | 30% |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuna Luso | 14 | 57% | 24 | 10 | 14 | 27 | 2.43 |
| 2 | Manauara | 14 | 50% | 27 | 11 | 16 | 26 | 2.71 |
| 3 | Manaus (AM) | 14 | 43% | 21 | 17 | 4 | 23 | 2.71 |
| 4 | Independencia | 14 | 43% | 18 | 19 | -1 | 21 | 2.64 |
| 5 | Ag. Maraba | 14 | 36% | 22 | 14 | 8 | 20 | 2.57 |
| 6 | Trem-AP | 14 | 36% | 23 | 24 | -1 | 18 | 3.36 |
| 7 | GA Sampaio | 14 | 29% | 17 | 24 | -7 | 15 | 2.93 |
| 8 | Humaita AC | 14 | 7% | 12 | 45 | -33 | 4 | 4.07 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Altos/PI | 14 | 50% | 22 | 14 | 8 | 26 | 2.57 |
| 2 | Imperatriz(MA) | 14 | 50% | 17 | 15 | 2 | 24 | 2.29 |
| 3 | Sampaio Correa | 14 | 36% | 17 | 11 | 6 | 21 | 2.00 |
| 4 | Maranhao | 14 | 29% | 18 | 12 | 6 | 19 | 2.14 |
| 5 | Iguatu CE | 14 | 36% | 15 | 15 | 0 | 18 | 2.14 |
| 6 | Tocantinopolis | 14 | 21% | 11 | 17 | -6 | 15 | 2.00 |
| 7 | Parnahyba PI | 14 | 21% | 16 | 22 | -6 | 14 | 2.71 |
| 8 | Maracana CE | 14 | 21% | 12 | 22 | -10 | 12 | 2.43 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | America FC Natal RN | 14 | 57% | 21 | 9 | 12 | 27 | 2.14 |
| 2 | Santa Cruz | 14 | 57% | 20 | 10 | 10 | 27 | 2.14 |
| 3 | Central SC | 14 | 50% | 15 | 7 | 8 | 26 | 1.57 |
| 4 | Ferroviario CE | 14 | 36% | 15 | 19 | -4 | 18 | 2.43 |
| 5 | Horizonte CE | 14 | 36% | 14 | 17 | -3 | 17 | 2.21 |
| 6 | Santa Cruz RN | 14 | 36% | 13 | 20 | -7 | 17 | 2.36 |
| 7 | Treze Campina Grande PB | 14 | 29% | 7 | 20 | -13 | 13 | 1.93 |
| 8 | Sousa PB | 14 | 21% | 11 | 14 | -3 | 12 | 1.79 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agremiação Sportiva Arapiraquense | 14 | 64% | 27 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 2.50 |
| 2 | Lagarto | 14 | 50% | 20 | 16 | 4 | 23 | 2.57 |
| 3 | CS Sergipe | 14 | 43% | 16 | 10 | 6 | 22 | 1.86 |
| 4 | Juazeirense | 14 | 43% | 12 | 15 | -3 | 22 | 1.93 |
| 5 | Uniao Atletica Carmolandense/TO | 14 | 36% | 14 | 16 | -2 | 19 | 2.14 |
| 6 | Jequie BA | 14 | 29% | 15 | 16 | -1 | 16 | 2.21 |
| 7 | Barcelona BA | 14 | 14% | 9 | 20 | -11 | 11 | 2.07 |
| 8 | SC Penedense | 14 | 7% | 5 | 17 | -12 | 8 | 1.57 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aparecidense GO | 14 | 71% | 32 | 12 | 20 | 32 | 3.14 |
| 2 | Ceilandia DF | 14 | 57% | 23 | 14 | 9 | 28 | 2.64 |
| 3 | Luverdense | 14 | 50% | 14 | 12 | 2 | 25 | 1.86 |
| 4 | Mixto EC | 14 | 43% | 22 | 13 | 9 | 24 | 2.50 |
| 5 | Capital CF | 14 | 29% | 14 | 12 | 2 | 17 | 1.86 |
| 6 | Goiania | 14 | 14% | 12 | 22 | -10 | 10 | 2.43 |
| 7 | Goianesia GO | 14 | 7% | 11 | 22 | -11 | 8 | 2.36 |
| 8 | Porto Velho EC | 14 | 7% | 9 | 30 | -21 | 7 | 2.79 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Portuguesa Desportos | 14 | 64% | 22 | 13 | 9 | 30 | 2.50 |
| 2 | Rio Branco-ES | 14 | 57% | 19 | 9 | 10 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 3 | Ah so Santa SP | 14 | 43% | 20 | 18 | 2 | 21 | 2.71 |
| 4 | CFRJ Marica RJ | 14 | 36% | 14 | 14 | 0 | 19 | 2.00 |
| 5 | Porto Vitoria | 14 | 29% | 14 | 13 | 1 | 17 | 1.93 |
| 6 | Pouso Alegre | 14 | 36% | 13 | 18 | -5 | 17 | 2.21 |
| 7 | Nova Iguacu | 14 | 21% | 13 | 16 | -3 | 15 | 2.07 |
| 8 | Boavista S.C. | 14 | 14% | 9 | 23 | -14 | 9 | 2.29 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 64% | 21 | 7 | 14 | 30 | 2.00 |
| 2 | Cianorte PR | 14 | 43% | 22 | 17 | 5 | 22 | 2.79 |
| 3 | Goiatuba | 14 | 43% | 21 | 16 | 5 | 22 | 2.64 |
| 4 | Cascavel PR | 14 | 36% | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 | 2.14 |
| 5 | Uberlandia MG | 14 | 29% | 21 | 20 | 1 | 16 | 2.93 |
| 6 | Monte Azul SP | 14 | 21% | 13 | 18 | -5 | 14 | 2.21 |
| 7 | Operario MS | 14 | 21% | 13 | 22 | -9 | 14 | 2.50 |
| 8 | Itabirito | 14 | 7% | 11 | 22 | -11 | 10 | 2.36 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Esporte Clube São José Porto Alegre | 14 | 50% | 21 | 11 | 10 | 26 | 2.29 |
| 2 | Barra FC | 14 | 57% | 20 | 10 | 10 | 26 | 2.14 |
| 3 | Marcilio Dias SC | 14 | 36% | 17 | 15 | 2 | 21 | 2.29 |
| 4 | Joinville SC | 14 | 43% | 11 | 11 | 0 | 21 | 1.57 |
| 5 | Guarany de Bage | 14 | 36% | 11 | 14 | -3 | 19 | 1.79 |
| 6 | Brasil de Pelotas | 14 | 36% | 11 | 12 | -1 | 16 | 1.64 |
| 7 | Azuriz FC | 14 | 21% | 6 | 14 | -8 | 13 | 1.43 |
| 8 | São Luiz | 14 | 29% | 10 | 20 | -10 | 13 | 2.14 |