1.89
W
L
W
D
W
Chessman Chiba FC
China /
Chinese Macao Liga de Elite
Sunday Aug 03, 2025 - 08:10 (America/New_York)
Chessman Chiba FC vs Gala FC
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
1.38
D
L
W
L
W
Gala FC
Past H2H ▼
Match Insights
Chessman Chiba FC vs Gala FC82%
Over 2.5
League Average: 79%
100%
Over 1.5
League Average: 91%
5.25
Goals / Match
League Average: 4.75
58%
BTTS
League Average: 47%
Chessman Chiba FC
China - Chinese Macao Liga de Elite
League Pos.
1 / 5
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
L
W
W
W | 1.63 |
| Home |
W
L
W
D
W | 1.89 |
| Away |
L
W
L
W
W | 1.29 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 50% | 56% | 43% |
| AVG | 4.81 | 5.11 | 4.43 |
| Scored | 2.94 | 3.11 | 2.71 |
| Conceded | 1.88 | 2 | 1.71 |
| BTTS | 50% | 78% | 14% |
| CS | 25% | 22% | 29% |
| FTS | 25% | 0% | 57% |
Gala FC
China - Chinese Macao Liga de Elite
League Pos.
2 / 5
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
W
W
D
W | 1.56 |
| Home |
L
W
W
D
W | 1.75 |
| Away |
D
L
W
L
W | 1.38 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| AVG | 4.75 | 4.13 | 5.38 |
| Scored | 3.13 | 2.63 | 3.63 |
| Conceded | 1.63 | 1.5 | 1.75 |
| BTTS | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| CS | 38% | 50% | 25% |
| FTS | 25% | 13% | 38% |
Attacking Strength
Which side will deliver more goals?Gala FC is +17% better in terms of Goals Scored
Chessman Chiba FC at Home
Gala FC at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Scored Per Game | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 63% |
| Over 1.5 | 89% | 50% |
| Over 2.5 | 78% | 50% |
| Over 3.5 | 33% | 38% |
| Failed To Score | 0% | 38% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 67% | 63% |
| Scored in 2H | 89% | 50% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 56% | 50% |
| Scored Average 1H | 0.78 | 1.63 |
| Scored Average 2H | 2.33 | 2.00 |
* These figures reflect Chessman Chiba FC's goal record at home and Gala FC's scoring trend on the road.
Chance of Team Scoring
Will the team score or not?Chessman Chiba FC
Gala FC
BTTS
Defensive Gaps
Which team is more likely to concede?Gala FC is +13% better in terms of Goals Conceded
Chessman Chiba FC at Home
Gala FC at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Conceded Per Game | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 78% | 75% |
| Over 1.5 | 56% | 50% |
| Over 2.5 | 44% | 38% |
| Over 3.5 | 22% | 13% |
| Failed To Concede | 22% | 25% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 33% | 38% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 33% | 50% |
| Conceded in Both Halves | 56% | 38% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 0.89 | 1.00 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 1.11 | 0.75 |
* Based on Chessman Chiba FC's goals allowed at home and Gala FC's away defensive performance.
Goal Expectation
Will we see a high-scoring game and both teams score?Over X Goals
1st/2nd Half
Under X Goals
| Match Goals | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 2.5 | 89% | 75% | 82% |
| Over 3.5 | 78% | 63% | 71% |
| Over 4.5 | 67% | 50% | 59% |
| BTTS | 78% | 38% | 58% |
| BTTS & Win | 33% | 13% | 23% |
| BTTS & Draw | 22% | 25% | 24% |
| BTTS & Over 2.5 | 67% | 25% | 46% |
| BTTS No & Over 2.5 | 22% | 50% | 36% |
| First Half Goals | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| 2nd Half Goals | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| BTTS Both Halves | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| Match Goals | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 2.5 | 11% | 25% | 18% |
| Under 3.5 | 22% | 38% | 30% |
| Under 4.5 | 33% | 50% | 42% |
Corner Generation Rate – Both Teams Combined
Shows expected corner count based on both teams' individual performance this season.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Total Match Corner Volume – Historical Performance
Displays how often combined corners exceed each threshold, based on past matches.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Team Discipline Profile
How often each team sees cardsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Match Card Forecast
Expected total cards from both teamsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
More stats
Team Shots
Match Shots
| Team Shots | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots / Match | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Shots Conversion Rate | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Shots On Target / M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shots Off Target / M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shots Per Goal Scored | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Offside Stats | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC | Average |
| Offsides / Match | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Misc Stats | Chessman Chiba FC | Gala FC | Average |
| Average Possession | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Draw % FT | 22% | 25% | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUST IPO | 8 | 88% | 39 | 5 | 34 | 44 | 5.50 |
| 2 | Shao Jiang | 8 | 88% | 20 | 7 | 13 | 43 | 3.38 |
| 3 | Macau University | 8 | 25% | 8 | 22 | -14 | 26 | 3.75 |
| 4 | S.L. Benfica de Macau | 8 | 38% | 12 | 14 | -2 | 25 | 3.25 |
| 5 | Ching Fung | 8 | 0% | 4 | 35 | -31 | 20 | 4.88 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chessman Chiba FC | 8 | 75% | 29 | 4 | 25 | 29 | 4.13 |
| 2 | Gala FC | 8 | 63% | 33 | 9 | 24 | 25 | 5.25 |
| 3 | Hang Sai | 8 | 63% | 36 | 8 | 28 | 23 | 5.50 |
| 4 | Barbie Lun Lok | 8 | 13% | 5 | 53 | -48 | 6 | 7.25 |
| 5 | Sporting Clube de Macau | 8 | 13% | 9 | 38 | -29 | 4 | 5.88 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUST IPO | 9 | 78% | 39 | 5 | 34 | 23 | 4.89 |
| 2 | Shao Jiang | 9 | 78% | 44 | 6 | 38 | 22 | 5.56 |
| 3 | Macau University | 9 | 67% | 25 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 3.89 |
| 4 | Ching Fung | 9 | 56% | 18 | 7 | 11 | 19 | 2.78 |
| 5 | S.L. Benfica de Macau | 9 | 56% | 19 | 14 | 5 | 16 | 3.67 |
| 6 | Chessman Chiba FC | 9 | 33% | 19 | 26 | -7 | 10 | 5.00 |
| 7 | Gala FC | 9 | 22% | 17 | 18 | -1 | 9 | 3.89 |
| 8 | Hang Sai | 9 | 22% | 17 | 26 | -9 | 7 | 4.78 |
| 9 | Barbie Lun Lok | 9 | 11% | 10 | 40 | -30 | 3 | 5.56 |
| 10 | Sporting Clube de Macau | 9 | 0% | 1 | 57 | -56 | 0 | 6.44 |