1
W
L
L
D
W
Beijing IT
China /
Chinese Football League 2
Saturday Jul 26, 2025 - 04:00 (America/New_York)
Beijing IT vs Tai’an Tiankuang
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
Stadium - Beijing Institute of Technology Stadium (Beijing)
0.9
L
L
W
W
D
Tai’an Tiankuang
Past H2H ▼
Match Insights
Beijing IT vs Tai’an Tiankuang35%
Over 2.5
League Average: 37%
65%
Over 1.5
League Average: 67%
2.3
Goals / Match
League Average: 2.24
40%
BTTS
League Average: 41%
Beijing IT
China - Chinese Football League 2
League Pos.
11 / 12
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
D
L
W | 0.7 |
| Home |
W
L
L
D
W | 1 |
| Away |
L
L
W
L
L | 0.4 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 20% | 30% | 10% |
| AVG | 2.35 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| Scored | 0.95 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Conceded | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| BTTS | 40% | 30% | 50% |
| CS | 20% | 30% | 10% |
| FTS | 40% | 40% | 40% |
Tai’an Tiankuang
China - Chinese Football League 2
League Pos.
7 / 12
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
L
W
D
D | 1 |
| Home |
D
L
L
L
D | 1.1 |
| Away |
L
L
W
W
D | 0.9 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 25% | 30% | 20% |
| AVG | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 |
| Scored | 0.95 | 1 | 0.9 |
| Conceded | 1.25 | 1.1 | 1.4 |
| BTTS | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| CS | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| FTS | 40% | 30% | 50% |
Attacking Strength
Which side will deliver more goals?Beijing IT is +22% better in terms of Goals Scored
Beijing IT at Home
Tai’an Tiankuang at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Scored Per Game | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 60% | 50% |
| Over 1.5 | 50% | 30% |
| Over 2.5 | 0% | 10% |
| Over 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 40% | 50% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 40% | 30% |
| Scored in 2H | 20% | 30% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 0% | 10% |
| Scored Average 1H | 0.7 | 0.4 |
| Scored Average 2H | 0.4 | 0.5 |
* These figures reflect Beijing IT's goal record at home and Tai’an Tiankuang's scoring trend on the road.
Chance of Team Scoring
Will the team score or not?Beijing IT
Tai’an Tiankuang
BTTS
Defensive Gaps
Which team is more likely to concede?Beijing IT is +14% better in terms of Goals Conceded
Beijing IT at Home
Tai’an Tiankuang at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Conceded Per Game | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 70% | 80% |
| Over 1.5 | 30% | 40% |
| Over 2.5 | 20% | 10% |
| Over 3.5 | 0% | 10% |
| Failed To Concede | 30% | 20% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 40% | 40% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 60% | 50% |
| Conceded in Both Halves | 30% | 30% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 0.80 | 0.70 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 0.40 | 0.70 |
* Based on Beijing IT's goals allowed at home and Tai’an Tiankuang's away defensive performance.
Goal Expectation
Will we see a high-scoring game and both teams score?Over X Goals
1st/2nd Half
Under X Goals
| Match Goals | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Over 1.5 | 70% | 60% | 65% |
| Over 2.5 | 20% | 50% | 35% |
| Over 3.5 | 20% | 30% | 25% |
| Over 4.5 | 20% | 10% | 15% |
| BTTS | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| BTTS & Win | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| BTTS & Draw | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| BTTS & Over 2.5 | 20% | 50% | 35% |
| BTTS No & Over 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| First Half Goals | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| 2nd Half Goals | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| BTTS Both Halves | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| Match Goals | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 0.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Under 1.5 | 30% | 40% | 35% |
| Under 2.5 | 80% | 50% | 65% |
| Under 3.5 | 80% | 70% | 75% |
| Under 4.5 | 80% | 90% | 85% |
Corner Generation Rate – Both Teams Combined
Shows expected corner count based on both teams' individual performance this season.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Total Match Corner Volume – Historical Performance
Displays how often combined corners exceed each threshold, based on past matches.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Team Discipline Profile
How often each team sees cardsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Match Card Forecast
Expected total cards from both teamsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
More stats
Team Shots
Match Shots
| Team Shots | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots / Match | 10.7 | 10.8 | 10.75 |
| Shots Conversion Rate | 10% | 8% | 9% |
| Shots On Target / M | 7.1 | 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Shots Off Target / M | 10.9 | 12.6 | 11.75 |
| Shots Per Goal Scored | 9.73 | 12 | 10.87 |
| Team Shots Over 10.5 | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| Team Shots Over 11.5 | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| Team Shots Over 12.5 | 30% | 40% | 35% |
| Team Shots Over 13.5 | 30% | 30% | 30% |
| Team Shots Over 14.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Team Shots Over 15.5 | 10% | 20% | 15% |
| Team Shots Over 16.5 | 10% | 20% | 15% |
| Team Shots Over 17.5 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Team Shots Over 18.5 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Team Shots Over 19.5 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Team Shots Over 20.5 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Team Shots Over 21.5 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Team Shots Over 22.5 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Team Shots Over 23.5 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Team Shots Over 24.5 | 10% | 0% | 5% |
| Team Shots On Target 3.5+ | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| Team Shots On Target 4.5+ | 40% | 30% | 35% |
| Team Shots On Target 5.5+ | 10% | 20% | 15% |
| Team Shots On Target 6.5+ | 10% | 20% | 15% |
| Team Shots On Target 7.5+ | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Team Shots On Target 8.5+ | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Team Shots On Target 9.5+ | 0% | 10% | 5% |
| Offside Stats | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang | Average |
| Offsides / Match | 3 | 1.5 | 2.25 |
| Over 3.5 Offsides | 50% | 20% | 35% |
| Over 4.5 Offsides | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Over 5.5 Offsides | 0% | 10% | 5% |
| Misc Stats | Beijing IT | Tai’an Tiankuang | Average |
| Average Possession | 47.2% | 48.7% | 47.95% |
| Draw % FT | 10% | 30% | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wuxi Wugou | 22 | 59% | 31 | 14 | 17 | 45 | 2.05 |
| 2 | Shandong Taishan B | 22 | 45% | 36 | 22 | 14 | 39 | 2.64 |
| 3 | Haimen Codion | 22 | 45% | 38 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 2.82 |
| 4 | Changchun Xidu | 22 | 45% | 19 | 11 | 8 | 38 | 1.36 |
| 5 | Jiangxi Lushan | 22 | 45% | 25 | 22 | 3 | 35 | 2.14 |
| 6 | Hangzhou Linping Wuyue | 22 | 36% | 24 | 26 | -2 | 32 | 2.27 |
| 7 | Tai’an Tiankuang | 22 | 32% | 22 | 25 | -3 | 26 | 2.14 |
| 8 | Shanghai Port B | 22 | 27% | 25 | 26 | -1 | 25 | 2.32 |
| 9 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai | 22 | 23% | 17 | 32 | -15 | 23 | 2.23 |
| 10 | Lanzhou Longyuan Athletics | 22 | 23% | 21 | 32 | -11 | 22 | 2.41 |
| 11 | Beijing IT | 22 | 23% | 21 | 29 | -8 | 17 | 2.27 |
| 12 | Hubei Istar | 22 | 14% | 23 | 39 | -16 | 16 | 2.82 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangxi Hengchen Football Club | 22 | 82% | 47 | 9 | 38 | 57 | 2.55 |
| 2 | Shenzhen 2028 | 22 | 64% | 30 | 13 | 17 | 48 | 1.95 |
| 3 | Chengdu Rongcheng B | 22 | 55% | 39 | 20 | 19 | 40 | 2.68 |
| 4 | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 22 | 55% | 33 | 25 | 8 | 39 | 2.64 |
| 5 | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 22 | 50% | 31 | 18 | 13 | 38 | 2.23 |
| 6 | Wuhan Three Towns B | 22 | 36% | 21 | 20 | 1 | 29 | 1.86 |
| 7 | Wenzhou Professional Football Club | 22 | 27% | 21 | 27 | -6 | 26 | 2.18 |
| 8 | Ganzhou Ruishi | 22 | 18% | 18 | 28 | -10 | 23 | 2.09 |
| 9 | Guangdong Mingtu | 22 | 18% | 20 | 32 | -12 | 20 | 2.36 |
| 10 | Kunming City Star | 22 | 18% | 15 | 31 | -16 | 19 | 2.09 |
| 11 | Quanzhou Yassin | 22 | 14% | 13 | 30 | -17 | 15 | 1.95 |
| 12 | Guangxi Lanhang Football Club | 22 | 0% | 10 | 45 | -35 | 6 | 2.50 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangxi Hengchen Football Club | 24 | 83% | 52 | 12 | 40 | 63 | 2.67 |
| 2 | Wuxi Wugou | 24 | 63% | 35 | 14 | 21 | 51 | 2.04 |
| 3 | Shenzhen 2028 | 24 | 58% | 30 | 15 | 15 | 49 | 1.88 |
| 4 | Chengdu Rongcheng B | 24 | 54% | 42 | 22 | 20 | 44 | 2.67 |
| 5 | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 24 | 54% | 35 | 28 | 7 | 42 | 2.63 |
| 6 | Shandong Taishan B | 24 | 42% | 37 | 24 | 13 | 40 | 2.54 |
| 7 | Changchun Xidu | 24 | 42% | 20 | 13 | 7 | 39 | 1.38 |
| 8 | Haimen Codion | 24 | 42% | 42 | 30 | 12 | 38 | 3.00 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 24 | 46% | 34 | 23 | 11 | 39 | 2.38 |
| 2 | Hangzhou Linping Wuyue | 24 | 38% | 25 | 27 | -2 | 35 | 2.17 |
| 3 | Shanghai Port B | 24 | 29% | 28 | 28 | 0 | 29 | 2.33 |
| 4 | Wenzhou Professional Football Club | 24 | 25% | 21 | 28 | -7 | 27 | 2.04 |
| 5 | Lanzhou Longyuan Athletics | 24 | 25% | 24 | 32 | -8 | 26 | 2.33 |
| 6 | Guangdong Mingtu | 24 | 21% | 21 | 35 | -14 | 23 | 2.33 |
| 7 | Hubei Istar | 24 | 17% | 26 | 40 | -14 | 20 | 2.75 |
| 8 | Quanzhou Yassin | 24 | 13% | 13 | 31 | -18 | 16 | 1.83 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jiangxi Lushan | 24 | 50% | 27 | 22 | 5 | 41 | 2.04 |
| 2 | Wuhan Three Towns B | 24 | 33% | 22 | 22 | 0 | 30 | 1.83 |
| 3 | Tai’an Tiankuang | 24 | 29% | 24 | 27 | -3 | 28 | 2.13 |
| 4 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai | 24 | 25% | 19 | 32 | -13 | 27 | 2.13 |
| 5 | Ganzhou Ruishi | 24 | 17% | 18 | 31 | -13 | 23 | 2.04 |
| 6 | Beijing IT | 23 | 26% | 22 | 29 | -7 | 20 | 2.22 |
| 7 | Kunming City Star | 24 | 17% | 15 | 32 | -17 | 20 | 1.96 |
| 8 | Guangxi Lanhang Football Club | 23 | 0% | 11 | 46 | -35 | 7 | 2.48 |