3
W
W
W
W
W
Broadmeadow Magic
Friday Aug 01, 2025 - 06:00 (America/New_York)
Broadmeadow Magic vs Valentine
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
Stadium - Wanderers Oval (Broadmeadows)
0.9
L
D
L
D
L
Valentine
Past H2H ▼
Match Insights
Broadmeadow Magic vs Valentine79%
Over 2.5
League Average: 68%
90%
Over 1.5
League Average: 85%
3.67
Goals / Match
League Average: 3.45
58%
BTTS
League Average: 59%
Broadmeadow Magic
Australia - Australia Northern New South Wales Premier League
League Pos.
1 / 12
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
W
W | 2.65 |
| Home |
W
W
W
W
W | 3 |
| Away |
W
D
W
W
W | 2.36 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 85% | 100% | 73% |
| AVG | 2.95 | 3.44 | 2.55 |
| Scored | 2.2 | 2.67 | 1.82 |
| Conceded | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.73 |
| BTTS | 50% | 56% | 45% |
| CS | 45% | 44% | 45% |
| FTS | 10% | 0% | 18% |
Valentine
Australia - Australia Northern New South Wales Premier League
League Pos.
11 / 12
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
D
W
L
L | 0.8 |
| Home |
L
W
L
W
L | 0.7 |
| Away |
L
D
L
D
L | 0.9 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| AVG | 4.15 | 4.4 | 3.9 |
| Scored | 1.35 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Conceded | 2.8 | 3.3 | 2.3 |
| BTTS | 65% | 70% | 60% |
| CS | 15% | 10% | 20% |
| FTS | 25% | 20% | 30% |
Attacking Strength
Which side will deliver more goals?Broadmeadow Magic is +67% better in terms of Goals Scored
Broadmeadow Magic at Home
Valentine at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Scored Per Game | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 70% |
| Over 1.5 | 89% | 50% |
| Over 2.5 | 44% | 30% |
| Over 3.5 | 22% | 10% |
| Failed To Score | 0% | 30% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 67% | 40% |
| Scored in 2H | 89% | 50% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 56% | 20% |
| Scored Average 1H | 1.22 | 0.5 |
| Scored Average 2H | 1.44 | 1.10 |
* These figures reflect Broadmeadow Magic's goal record at home and Valentine's scoring trend on the road.
Chance of Team Scoring
Will the team score or not?Broadmeadow Magic
Valentine
BTTS
Defensive Gaps
Which team is more likely to concede?Broadmeadow Magic is +66% better in terms of Goals Conceded
Broadmeadow Magic at Home
Valentine at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Conceded Per Game | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 56% | 80% |
| Over 1.5 | 22% | 80% |
| Over 2.5 | 0% | 30% |
| Over 3.5 | 0% | 10% |
| Failed To Concede | 44% | 20% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 89% | 60% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 44% | 20% |
| Conceded in Both Halves | 11% | 40% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 0.11 | 0.80 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 0.67 | 1.50 |
* Based on Broadmeadow Magic's goals allowed at home and Valentine's away defensive performance.
Goal Expectation
Will we see a high-scoring game and both teams score?Over X Goals
1st/2nd Half
Under X Goals
| Match Goals | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 90% | 95% |
| Over 1.5 | 89% | 90% | 90% |
| Over 2.5 | 78% | 80% | 79% |
| Over 3.5 | 44% | 60% | 52% |
| Over 4.5 | 33% | 40% | 37% |
| BTTS | 56% | 60% | 58% |
| BTTS & Win | 56% | 10% | 33% |
| BTTS & Draw | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| BTTS & Over 2.5 | 56% | 60% | 58% |
| BTTS No & Over 2.5 | 22% | 20% | 21% |
| First Half Goals | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| 2nd Half Goals | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| BTTS Both Halves | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| Match Goals | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 0.5 | 0% | 10% | 5% |
| Under 1.5 | 11% | 10% | 11% |
| Under 2.5 | 22% | 20% | 21% |
| Under 3.5 | 56% | 40% | 48% |
| Under 4.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
Corner Generation Rate – Both Teams Combined
Shows expected corner count based on both teams' individual performance this season.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
| Match Corners | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| OVER 1.5 | |||
| OVER 2.5 | |||
| OVER 3.5 | |||
| OVER 4.5 | |||
| OVER 5.5 | |||
| OVER 6.5 | |||
| OVER 7.5 | |||
| OVER 8.5 | |||
| OVER 9.5 | |||
| OVER 10.5 | |||
| OVER 11.5 | |||
| OVER 12.5 | |||
| OVER 13.5 |
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Total Match Corner Volume – Historical Performance
Displays how often combined corners exceed each threshold, based on past matches.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Team Discipline Profile
How often each team sees cardsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Match Card Forecast
Expected total cards from both teamsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
More stats
Team Shots
Match Shots
| Team Shots | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots / Match | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Shots Conversion Rate | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Shots On Target / M | 14.67 | 17.3 | 15.99 |
| Shots Off Target / M | 8.22 | 13.3 | 10.76 |
| Shots Per Goal Scored | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Team Shots On Target 3.5+ | 89% | 70% | 80% |
| Team Shots On Target 4.5+ | 89% | 60% | 75% |
| Team Shots On Target 5.5+ | 89% | 50% | 70% |
| Team Shots On Target 6.5+ | 78% | 50% | 64% |
| Team Shots On Target 7.5+ | 44% | 40% | 42% |
| Team Shots On Target 8.5+ | 44% | 20% | 32% |
| Team Shots On Target 9.5+ | 44% | 20% | 32% |
| Team Shots On Target 10.5+ | 33% | 20% | 27% |
| Team Shots On Target 11.5+ | 33% | 20% | 27% |
| Team Shots On Target 12.5+ | 33% | 20% | 27% |
| Team Shots On Target 13.5+ | 22% | 10% | 16% |
| Team Shots On Target 14.5+ | 11% | 10% | 11% |
| Team Shots On Target 15.5+ | 11% | 0% | 6% |
| Offside Stats | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine | Average |
| Offsides / Match | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Misc Stats | Broadmeadow Magic | Valentine | Average |
| Average Possession | 56.33% | 48.8% | 52.57% |
| Draw % FT | 0% | 30% | 15% |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broadmeadow Magic | 22 | 86% | 50 | 18 | 32 | 59 | 3.09 |
| 2 | Edgeworth Eagles FC | 22 | 77% | 50 | 15 | 35 | 53 | 2.95 |
| 3 | Weston Workers FC | 22 | 73% | 61 | 25 | 36 | 50 | 3.91 |
| 4 | Lambton Jarvis | 22 | 41% | 37 | 29 | 8 | 33 | 3.00 |
| 5 | Maitland | 22 | 41% | 42 | 41 | 1 | 32 | 3.77 |
| 6 | Newcastle Olympic | 22 | 36% | 47 | 38 | 9 | 31 | 3.86 |
| 7 | Charleston City Blues | 22 | 27% | 32 | 34 | -2 | 24 | 3.00 |
| 8 | Adamstown Rosebuds FC | 22 | 32% | 33 | 47 | -14 | 23 | 3.64 |
| 9 | Cooks Hill United | 22 | 32% | 26 | 47 | -21 | 23 | 3.32 |
| 10 | Belmont Swansea United SC | 22 | 18% | 34 | 45 | -11 | 20 | 3.59 |
| 11 | Valentine | 22 | 18% | 28 | 60 | -32 | 16 | 4.00 |
| 12 | New Lambton FC | 22 | 5% | 21 | 62 | -41 | 7 | 3.77 |