2.08
W
W
W
D
W
FC Tulsa
United States /
USL Championship
Saturday Oct 11, 2025 - 20:00 (America/New_York)
FC Tulsa vs San Antonio
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
Stadium - Oneok Field (Tulsa)
1.42
D
D
D
W
L
San Antonio
Past H2H ▼
Match Insights
FC Tulsa vs San Antonio48%
Over 2.5
League Average: 50%
68%
Over 1.5
League Average: 72%
2.84
Goals / Match
League Average: 2.65
60%
BTTS
League Average: 53%
Previous Encounters Overview
FC Tulsa vs San Antonio
82%
Over 1.5
18 / 22
45%
Over 2.5
10 / 22
18%
Over 3.5
4 / 22
68%
BTTS
15 / 22
18%
Clean Sheets
FC Tulsa
23%
Clean Sheets
San Antonio
FC Tulsa
United States - USL Championship
League Pos.
1 / 12
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
D
W
D
L
W | 1.85 |
| Home |
W
W
W
D
W | 2.08 |
| Away |
D
L
W
D
L | 1.64 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 52% | 62% | 43% |
| AVG | 2.7 | 2.92 | 2.5 |
| Scored | 1.63 | 1.85 | 1.43 |
| Conceded | 1.07 | 1.08 | 1.07 |
| BTTS | 63% | 62% | 64% |
| CS | 30% | 31% | 29% |
| FTS | 7% | 8% | 7% |
San Antonio
United States - USL Championship
League Pos.
6 / 12
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
W
W
D
L | 1.42 |
| Home |
L
L
L
W
D | 1.43 |
| Away |
D
D
D
W
L | 1.42 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 38% | 43% | 33% |
| AVG | 2.54 | 2.36 | 2.75 |
| Scored | 1.31 | 1.29 | 1.33 |
| Conceded | 1.23 | 1.07 | 1.42 |
| BTTS | 54% | 50% | 58% |
| CS | 31% | 36% | 25% |
| FTS | 31% | 21% | 42% |
Attacking Strength
Which side will deliver more goals?FC Tulsa is +39% better in terms of Goals Scored
FC Tulsa at Home
San Antonio at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Scored Per Game | FC Tulsa | San Antonio |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 92% | 58% |
| Over 1.5 | 38% | 42% |
| Over 2.5 | 31% | 17% |
| Over 3.5 | 15% | 8% |
| Failed To Score | 8% | 42% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | FC Tulsa | San Antonio |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 54% | 42% |
| Scored in 2H | 69% | 42% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 31% | 25% |
| Scored Average 1H | 0.62 | 0.5 |
| Scored Average 2H | 1.23 | 0.83 |
* These figures reflect FC Tulsa's goal record at home and San Antonio's scoring trend on the road.
Chance of Team Scoring
Will the team score or not?FC Tulsa
San Antonio
BTTS
Defensive Gaps
Which team is more likely to concede?FC Tulsa is +24% better in terms of Goals Conceded
FC Tulsa at Home
San Antonio at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Conceded Per Game | FC Tulsa | San Antonio |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 69% | 75% |
| Over 1.5 | 31% | 33% |
| Over 2.5 | 8% | 17% |
| Over 3.5 | 0% | 17% |
| Failed To Concede | 31% | 25% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | FC Tulsa | San Antonio |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 46% | 50% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 69% | 50% |
| Conceded in Both Halves | 15% | 25% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 0.77 | 0.67 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 0.31 | 0.75 |
* Based on FC Tulsa's goals allowed at home and San Antonio's away defensive performance.
Goal Expectation
Will we see a high-scoring game and both teams score?Over X Goals
1st/2nd Half
Under X Goals
| Match Goals | FC Tulsa | San Antonio | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 75% | 88% |
| Over 1.5 | 69% | 67% | 68% |
| Over 2.5 | 46% | 50% | 48% |
| Over 3.5 | 23% | 33% | 28% |
| Over 4.5 | 23% | 25% | 24% |
| BTTS | 62% | 58% | 60% |
| BTTS & Win | 31% | 33% | 32% |
| BTTS & Draw | 23% | 17% | 20% |
| BTTS & Over 2.5 | 38% | 42% | 40% |
| BTTS No & Over 2.5 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| First Half Goals | FC Tulsa | San Antonio | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| 2nd Half Goals | FC Tulsa | San Antonio | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| BTTS Both Halves | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| Match Goals | FC Tulsa | San Antonio | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 0.5 | 0% | 25% | 13% |
| Under 1.5 | 31% | 33% | 32% |
| Under 2.5 | 54% | 50% | 52% |
| Under 3.5 | 77% | 67% | 72% |
| Under 4.5 | 77% | 75% | 76% |
Corner Generation Rate – Both Teams Combined
Shows expected corner count based on both teams' individual performance this season.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Total Match Corner Volume – Historical Performance
Displays how often combined corners exceed each threshold, based on past matches.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Team Discipline Profile
How often each team sees cardsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Match Card Forecast
Expected total cards from both teamsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
More stats
Team Shots
Match Shots
| Team Shots | FC Tulsa | San Antonio | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots / Match | 16.62 | 10.08 | 13.35 |
| Shots Conversion Rate | 11% | 13% | 12% |
| Shots On Target / M | 7.92 | 7.08 | 7.5 |
| Shots Off Target / M | 17.54 | 13.67 | 15.61 |
| Shots Per Goal Scored | 9 | 7.56 | 8.28 |
| Team Shots Over 11.5 | 85% | 33% | 59% |
| Team Shots Over 12.5 | 77% | 17% | 47% |
| Team Shots Over 13.5 | 77% | 8% | 43% |
| Team Shots Over 14.5 | 62% | 8% | 35% |
| Team Shots Over 15.5 | 54% | 8% | 31% |
| Team Shots Over 16.5 | 46% | 8% | 27% |
| Team Shots Over 17.5 | 46% | 8% | 27% |
| Team Shots Over 18.5 | 38% | 8% | 23% |
| Team Shots Over 19.5 | 38% | 8% | 23% |
| Team Shots Over 20.5 | 23% | 8% | 16% |
| Team Shots Over 21.5 | 23% | 8% | 16% |
| Team Shots Over 22.5 | 23% | 8% | 16% |
| Team Shots Over 23.5 | 23% | 8% | 16% |
| Team Shots Over 24.5 | 23% | 8% | 16% |
| Team Shots Over 25.5 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Team Shots Over 26.5 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Team Shots Over 27.5 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Team Shots Over 28.5 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Team Shots Over 29.5 | 8% | 0% | 4% |
| Team Shots On Target 3.5+ | 77% | 42% | 60% |
| Team Shots On Target 4.5+ | 54% | 17% | 36% |
| Team Shots On Target 5.5+ | 38% | 8% | 23% |
| Team Shots On Target 6.5+ | 38% | 8% | 23% |
| Team Shots On Target 7.5+ | 15% | 8% | 12% |
| Team Shots On Target 8.5+ | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Team Shots On Target 9.5+ | 0% | 8% | 4% |
| Offside Stats | FC Tulsa | San Antonio | Average |
| Offsides / Match | 1 | 1.17 | 1.09 |
| Over 2.5 Offsides | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Misc Stats | FC Tulsa | San Antonio | Average |
| Average Possession | 47% | 49.5% | 48.25% |
| Draw % FT | 23% | 42% | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville City FC | 30 | 73% | 56 | 19 | 37 | 73 | 2.50 |
| 2 | Charleston Battery | 30 | 63% | 62 | 32 | 30 | 62 | 3.13 |
| 3 | North Carolina | 30 | 43% | 40 | 39 | 1 | 45 | 2.63 |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 30 | 40% | 32 | 28 | 4 | 44 | 2.00 |
| 5 | Hartford Athletic | 30 | 43% | 48 | 36 | 12 | 44 | 2.80 |
| 6 | Loudoun United | 30 | 40% | 45 | 48 | -3 | 42 | 3.10 |
| 7 | Rhode Island | 30 | 33% | 29 | 29 | 0 | 38 | 1.93 |
| 8 | Detroit City | 30 | 30% | 33 | 35 | -2 | 37 | 2.27 |
| 9 | Indy Eleven | 30 | 33% | 44 | 52 | -8 | 35 | 3.20 |
| 10 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 30 | 30% | 43 | 50 | -7 | 34 | 3.10 |
| 11 | Miami FC | 30 | 27% | 29 | 44 | -15 | 30 | 2.43 |
| 12 | Birmingham Legion | 30 | 17% | 36 | 50 | -14 | 27 | 2.87 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Tulsa | 30 | 53% | 50 | 30 | 20 | 57 | 2.67 |
| 2 | Sacramento Republic FC | 30 | 43% | 44 | 27 | 17 | 48 | 2.37 |
| 3 | New Mexico United | 30 | 47% | 45 | 41 | 4 | 48 | 2.87 |
| 4 | El Paso Locomotive FC | 30 | 33% | 47 | 45 | 2 | 41 | 3.07 |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising FC | 30 | 30% | 48 | 48 | 0 | 40 | 3.20 |
| 6 | San Antonio | 30 | 37% | 39 | 38 | 1 | 40 | 2.57 |
| 7 | Orange County Blues FC | 30 | 33% | 44 | 45 | -1 | 39 | 2.97 |
| 8 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC | 30 | 33% | 35 | 47 | -12 | 37 | 2.73 |
| 9 | Lexington | 30 | 30% | 31 | 42 | -11 | 36 | 2.43 |
| 10 | Oakland Roots | 30 | 27% | 42 | 52 | -10 | 32 | 3.13 |
| 11 | Monterey Bay FC | 30 | 23% | 27 | 45 | -18 | 29 | 2.40 |
| 12 | Las Vegas Lights | 30 | 20% | 23 | 50 | -27 | 27 | 2.43 |