1.25
D
L
W
W
W
Hang Sai
China /
Chinese Macao Liga de Elite
Saturday Jul 12, 2025 - 09:10 (America/New_York)
Hang Sai vs Chessman Chiba FC
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
1
L
L
W
L
W
Chessman Chiba FC
Past H2H ▼
Match Insights
Hang Sai vs Chessman Chiba FC78%
Over 2.5
League Average: 79%
100%
Over 1.5
League Average: 91%
4.71
Goals / Match
League Average: 4.75
46%
BTTS
League Average: 47%
Hang Sai
China - Chinese Macao Liga de Elite
League Pos.
3 / 5
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
D
W
W
W | 1.31 |
| Home |
D
L
W
W
W | 1.25 |
| Away |
W
L
L
D
W | 1.4 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 38% | 38% | 40% |
| AVG | 4.92 | 4.75 | 5.2 |
| Scored | 2.85 | 3 | 2.6 |
| Conceded | 2.08 | 1.75 | 2.6 |
| BTTS | 62% | 75% | 40% |
| CS | 31% | 25% | 40% |
| FTS | 8% | 0% | 20% |
Chessman Chiba FC
China - Chinese Macao Liga de Elite
League Pos.
1 / 5
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
D
W
L
W | 1.43 |
| Home |
W
W
L
W
D | 1.75 |
| Away |
L
L
W
L
W | 1 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 43% | 50% | 33% |
| AVG | 5.07 | 5.38 | 4.67 |
| Scored | 2.93 | 3.13 | 2.67 |
| Conceded | 2.14 | 2.25 | 2 |
| BTTS | 57% | 88% | 17% |
| CS | 14% | 13% | 17% |
| FTS | 29% | 0% | 67% |
Attacking Strength
Which side will deliver more goals?Hang Sai is +12% better in terms of Goals Scored
Hang Sai at Home
Chessman Chiba FC at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Scored Per Game | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 33% |
| Over 1.5 | 38% | 33% |
| Over 2.5 | 38% | 33% |
| Over 3.5 | 25% | 33% |
| Failed To Score | 0% | 67% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 100% | 33% |
| Scored in 2H | 38% | 33% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 38% | 33% |
| Scored Average 1H | 1.63 | 1.67 |
| Scored Average 2H | 1.38 | 1.00 |
* These figures reflect Hang Sai's goal record at home and Chessman Chiba FC's scoring trend on the road.
Chance of Team Scoring
Will the team score or not?Hang Sai
Chessman Chiba FC
BTTS
Defensive Gaps
Which team is more likely to concede?Hang Sai is +13% better in terms of Goals Conceded
Hang Sai at Home
Chessman Chiba FC at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Conceded Per Game | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 75% | 83% |
| Over 1.5 | 63% | 67% |
| Over 2.5 | 25% | 33% |
| Over 3.5 | 13% | 17% |
| Failed To Concede | 25% | 17% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 38% | 50% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 50% | 33% |
| Conceded in Both Halves | 38% | 33% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 0.88 | 0.67 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 0.88 | 1.33 |
* Based on Hang Sai's goals allowed at home and Chessman Chiba FC's away defensive performance.
Goal Expectation
Will we see a high-scoring game and both teams score?Over X Goals
1st/2nd Half
Under X Goals
| Match Goals | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 2.5 | 88% | 67% | 78% |
| Over 3.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Over 4.5 | 38% | 33% | 36% |
| BTTS | 75% | 17% | 46% |
| BTTS & Win | 13% | 17% | 15% |
| BTTS & Draw | 13% | 0% | 7% |
| BTTS & Over 2.5 | 63% | 17% | 40% |
| BTTS No & Over 2.5 | 25% | 50% | 38% |
| First Half Goals | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| 2nd Half Goals | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| BTTS Both Halves | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| Match Goals | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 2.5 | 13% | 33% | 23% |
| Under 3.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Under 4.5 | 63% | 67% | 65% |
Corner Generation Rate – Both Teams Combined
Shows expected corner count based on both teams' individual performance this season.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Total Match Corner Volume – Historical Performance
Displays how often combined corners exceed each threshold, based on past matches.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Team Discipline Profile
How often each team sees cardsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Match Card Forecast
Expected total cards from both teamsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
More stats
Team Shots
Match Shots
| Team Shots | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots / Match | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Shots Conversion Rate | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Shots On Target / M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shots Off Target / M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shots Per Goal Scored | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Offside Stats | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC | Average |
| Offsides / Match | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Misc Stats | Hang Sai | Chessman Chiba FC | Average |
| Average Possession | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Draw % FT | 13% | 0% | 7% |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUST IPO | 8 | 88% | 39 | 5 | 34 | 44 | 5.50 |
| 2 | Shao Jiang | 8 | 88% | 20 | 7 | 13 | 43 | 3.38 |
| 3 | Macau University | 8 | 25% | 8 | 22 | -14 | 26 | 3.75 |
| 4 | S.L. Benfica de Macau | 8 | 38% | 12 | 14 | -2 | 25 | 3.25 |
| 5 | Ching Fung | 8 | 0% | 4 | 35 | -31 | 20 | 4.88 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chessman Chiba FC | 8 | 75% | 29 | 4 | 25 | 29 | 4.13 |
| 2 | Gala FC | 8 | 63% | 33 | 9 | 24 | 25 | 5.25 |
| 3 | Hang Sai | 8 | 63% | 36 | 8 | 28 | 23 | 5.50 |
| 4 | Barbie Lun Lok | 8 | 13% | 5 | 53 | -48 | 6 | 7.25 |
| 5 | Sporting Clube de Macau | 8 | 13% | 9 | 38 | -29 | 4 | 5.88 |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUST IPO | 9 | 78% | 39 | 5 | 34 | 23 | 4.89 |
| 2 | Shao Jiang | 9 | 78% | 44 | 6 | 38 | 22 | 5.56 |
| 3 | Macau University | 9 | 67% | 25 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 3.89 |
| 4 | Ching Fung | 9 | 56% | 18 | 7 | 11 | 19 | 2.78 |
| 5 | S.L. Benfica de Macau | 9 | 56% | 19 | 14 | 5 | 16 | 3.67 |
| 6 | Chessman Chiba FC | 9 | 33% | 19 | 26 | -7 | 10 | 5.00 |
| 7 | Gala FC | 9 | 22% | 17 | 18 | -1 | 9 | 3.89 |
| 8 | Hang Sai | 9 | 22% | 17 | 26 | -9 | 7 | 4.78 |
| 9 | Barbie Lun Lok | 9 | 11% | 10 | 40 | -30 | 3 | 5.56 |
| 10 | Sporting Clube de Macau | 9 | 0% | 1 | 57 | -56 | 0 | 6.44 |