1.5
L
W
Nottingham Forest
Thursday Nov 27, 2025 - 15:00 (America/New_York)
Nottingham Forest vs Malmo FF
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
1.5
W
L
Malmo FF
Past H2H ▼
Note: The current season has recently started, and one or both teams have played fewer than 5 matches.
Match Insights
Nottingham Forest vs Malmo FF50%
Over 2.5
League Average: 51%
100%
Over 1.5
League Average: 71%
3
Goals / Match
League Average: 2.51
25%
BTTS
League Average: 47%
Nottingham Forest
- UEFA Europa League
League Pos.
19 / 36
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
D
L
W
D | 1.25 |
| Home |
L
W | 1.5 |
| Away |
D
D | 1 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 25% | 50% | 0% |
| AVG | 2.75 | 3.5 | 2 |
| Scored | 1.5 | 2 | 1 |
| Conceded | 1.25 | 1.5 | 1 |
| BTTS | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| CS | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| FTS | 25% | 0% | 50% |
Malmo FF
- UEFA Europa League
League Pos.
7 / 36
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
L
L
D
L | 1.17 |
| Home |
W
L
D
L | 1 |
| Away |
W
L | 1.5 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 33% | 25% | 50% |
| AVG | 2.33 | 2.25 | 2.5 |
| Scored | 1.17 | 1.25 | 1 |
| Conceded | 1.17 | 1 | 1.5 |
| BTTS | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| CS | 33% | 25% | 50% |
| FTS | 33% | 25% | 50% |
Attacking Strength
Which side will deliver more goals?Nottingham Forest is +100% better in terms of Goals Scored
Nottingham Forest at Home
Malmo FF at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Scored Per Game | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 50% |
| Over 1.5 | 100% | 50% |
| Over 2.5 | 0% | 0% |
| Over 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 0% | 50% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 100% | 0% |
| Scored in 2H | 100% | 50% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 100% | 0% |
| Scored Average 1H | 1.00 | 0 |
| Scored Average 2H | 1.00 | 1.00 |
* These figures reflect Nottingham Forest's goal record at home and Malmo FF's scoring trend on the road.
Chance of Team Scoring
Will the team score or not?Nottingham Forest
Malmo FF
BTTS
Defensive Gaps
Which team is more likely to concede?Malmo FF is +0% better in terms of Goals Conceded
Nottingham Forest at Home
Malmo FF at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Conceded Per Game | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 50% | 50% |
| Over 1.5 | 50% | 50% |
| Over 2.5 | 50% | 50% |
| Over 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| Failed To Concede | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 50% | 50% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded in Both Halves | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 0.50 | 0.50 |
* Based on Nottingham Forest's goals allowed at home and Malmo FF's away defensive performance.
Goal Expectation
Will we see a high-scoring game and both teams score?Over X Goals
1st/2nd Half
Under X Goals
| Match Goals | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 2.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Over 3.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| Over 4.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| BTTS | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| BTTS & Win | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| BTTS & Draw | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| BTTS & Over 2.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| BTTS No & Over 2.5 | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| First Half Goals | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| 2nd Half Goals | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| BTTS Both Halves | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| Match Goals | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 2.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Under 3.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Under 4.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
Corner Generation Rate – Both Teams Combined
Shows expected corner count based on both teams' individual performance this season.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Total Match Corner Volume – Historical Performance
Displays how often combined corners exceed each threshold, based on past matches.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
| Match Corners | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| OVER 2.5 | |||
| OVER 3.5 | |||
| OVER 4.5 | |||
| OVER 5.5 | |||
| OVER 6.5 | |||
| OVER 7.5 | |||
| OVER 8.5 | |||
| OVER 9.5 | |||
| OVER 10.5 | |||
| OVER 11.5 | |||
| OVER 12.5 | |||
| OVER 13.5 | |||
| OVER 14.5 | |||
| OVER 15.5 | |||
| OVER 16.5 | |||
| OVER 17.5 |
Team Discipline Profile
How often each team sees cardsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Match Card Forecast
Expected total cards from both teamsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
More stats
Team Shots
Match Shots
| Team Shots | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots / Match | 4 | N/A | 2 |
| Shots Conversion Rate | 50% | N/A | 25% |
| Shots On Target / M | 2.5 | 0 | 1.25 |
| Shots Off Target / M | 6.5 | 0 | 3.25 |
| Shots Per Goal Scored | 2 | N/A | 1 |
| Offside Stats | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF | Average |
| Offsides / Match | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Misc Stats | Nottingham Forest | Malmo FF | Average |
| Average Possession | 25.5% | 0% | 12.75% |
| Draw % FT | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Midtjylland | 4 | 100% | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 3.50 |
| 2 | SC Freiburg | 4 | 75% | 8 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 2.75 |
| 3 | Ferencvarosi TC | 4 | 75% | 8 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 3.00 |
| 4 | RC Celta | 4 | 75% | 9 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 3.25 |
| 5 | Sporting Braga | 4 | 75% | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 3.00 |
| 6 | Aston Villa | 4 | 75% | 6 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 2.00 |
| 7 | Lyon | 4 | 75% | 5 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 1.75 |
| 8 | FC Viktoria Plzen | 4 | 50% | 6 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 2.00 |
| 9 | Real Betis | 4 | 50% | 6 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 2.00 |
| 10 | PAOK Saloniki | 4 | 50% | 9 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3.75 |
| 11 | Brann | 4 | 50% | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1.75 |
| 12 | Dinamo Zagreb | 4 | 50% | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 3.25 |
| 13 | Racing Genk | 4 | 50% | 5 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 2.25 |
| 14 | FC Porto | 4 | 50% | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 2.00 |
| 15 | Fenerbahce | 4 | 50% | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 2.00 |
| 16 | Panathinaikos | 4 | 50% | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 3.25 |
| 17 | FC Basel 1893 | 4 | 50% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 2.75 |
| 18 | AS Roma | 4 | 50% | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 2.25 |
| 19 | LOSC Lille | 4 | 50% | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3.00 |
| 20 | VfB Stuttgart | 4 | 50% | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2.00 |
| 21 | Go Ahead Eagles | 4 | 50% | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 | 2.25 |
| 22 | Young Boys | 4 | 50% | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 | 4.00 |
| 23 | Nottingham Forest | 4 | 25% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 2.75 |
| 24 | Bologna | 4 | 25% | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1.50 |
| 25 | Crvena Zvezda | 4 | 25% | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 | 2.00 |
| 26 | Sturm Graz | 4 | 25% | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 | 2.00 |
| 27 | Celtic FC | 4 | 25% | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 | 2.75 |
| 28 | Red Bull Salzburg | 4 | 25% | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 | 2.50 |
| 29 | Feyenoord | 4 | 25% | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 | 2.25 |
| 30 | Ludogorets Razgrad | 4 | 25% | 5 | 9 | -4 | 3 | 3.50 |
| 31 | Fotbal Club FCSB | 4 | 25% | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 | 2.50 |
| 32 | FC Utrecht | 4 | 0% | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 | 1.50 |
| 33 | Malmo FF | 4 | 0% | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 | 2.25 |
| 34 | Maccabi Tel Aviv | 4 | 0% | 1 | 8 | -7 | 1 | 2.25 |
| 35 | OGC Nice | 4 | 0% | 4 | 9 | -5 | 0 | 3.25 |
| 36 | Rangers | 4 | 0% | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 | 2.25 |