0.6
D
L
L
L
W
Qingdao Red Lions
China /
Chinese Football League 1
Sunday Sep 14, 2025 - 07:30 (America/New_York)
Qingdao Red Lions vs Foshan Nanshi
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
Stadium - Qingdao Tiantai Stadium (Qingdao)
0.7
L
D
W
L
L
Foshan Nanshi
Past H2H ▼
Match Insights
Qingdao Red Lions vs Foshan Nanshi35%
Over 2.5
League Average: 47%
65%
Over 1.5
League Average: 75%
2.3
Goals / Match
League Average: 2.59
40%
BTTS
League Average: 53%
Previous Encounters Overview
Qingdao Red Lions vs Foshan Nanshi
67%
Over 1.5
2 / 3
0%
Over 2.5
0 / 3
0%
Over 3.5
0 / 3
67%
BTTS
2 / 3
33%
Clean Sheets
Qingdao Red Lions
33%
Clean Sheets
Foshan Nanshi
Qingdao Red Lions
China - Chinese Football League 1
League Pos.
16 / 16
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
W
L | 0.57 |
| Home |
D
L
L
L
W | 0.6 |
| Away |
L
D
L
L
L | 0.55 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 10% | 10% | 9% |
| AVG | 1.95 | 2.2 | 1.73 |
| Scored | 0.62 | 0.7 | 0.55 |
| Conceded | 1.33 | 1.5 | 1.18 |
| BTTS | 38% | 40% | 36% |
| CS | 19% | 20% | 18% |
| FTS | 52% | 50% | 55% |
Foshan Nanshi
China - Chinese Football League 1
League Pos.
14 / 16
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
L
D
L
L | 0.86 |
| Home |
D
L
W
D
L | 1 |
| Away |
L
D
W
L
L | 0.7 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 19% | 18% | 20% |
| AVG | 2.52 | 2.64 | 2.4 |
| Scored | 0.9 | 1.09 | 0.7 |
| Conceded | 1.62 | 1.55 | 1.7 |
| BTTS | 57% | 73% | 40% |
| CS | 14% | 9% | 20% |
| FTS | 33% | 27% | 40% |
Attacking Strength
Which side will deliver more goals?Both teams equal is +0% better in terms of Goals Scored
Qingdao Red Lions at Home
Foshan Nanshi at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Scored Per Game | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 50% | 60% |
| Over 1.5 | 10% | 10% |
| Over 2.5 | 10% | 0% |
| Over 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 50% | 40% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 20% | 40% |
| Scored in 2H | 40% | 30% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 10% | 10% |
| Scored Average 1H | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Scored Average 2H | 0.4 | 0.3 |
* These figures reflect Qingdao Red Lions's goal record at home and Foshan Nanshi's scoring trend on the road.
Chance of Team Scoring
Will the team score or not?Qingdao Red Lions
Foshan Nanshi
BTTS
Defensive Gaps
Which team is more likely to concede?Qingdao Red Lions is +12% better in terms of Goals Conceded
Qingdao Red Lions at Home
Foshan Nanshi at AwayFull-Time
First Half / 2nd Half
| Conceded Per Game | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 80% | 80% |
| Over 1.5 | 40% | 70% |
| Over 2.5 | 20% | 20% |
| Over 3.5 | 10% | 0% |
| Failed To Concede | 20% | 20% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 50% | 50% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded in Both Halves | 30% | 20% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 0.80 | 0.90 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 0.70 | 0.80 |
* Based on Qingdao Red Lions's goals allowed at home and Foshan Nanshi's away defensive performance.
Goal Expectation
Will we see a high-scoring game and both teams score?Over X Goals
1st/2nd Half
Under X Goals
| Match Goals | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 90% | 100% | 95% |
| Over 1.5 | 60% | 70% | 65% |
| Over 2.5 | 20% | 50% | 35% |
| Over 3.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Over 4.5 | 10% | 0% | 5% |
| BTTS | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| BTTS & Win | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| BTTS & Draw | 20% | 10% | 15% |
| BTTS & Over 2.5 | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| BTTS No & Over 2.5 | 0% | 10% | 5% |
| First Half Goals | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| 2nd Half Goals | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | |||
| BTTS Both Halves | |||
| Over 0.5 | |||
| Over 1.5 | |||
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Under 0.5 | |||
| Under 1.5 | |||
| Under 2.5 |
| Match Goals | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 0.5 | 10% | 0% | 5% |
| Under 1.5 | 40% | 30% | 35% |
| Under 2.5 | 80% | 50% | 65% |
| Under 3.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Under 4.5 | 90% | 100% | 95% |
Corner Generation Rate – Both Teams Combined
Shows expected corner count based on both teams' individual performance this season.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Total Match Corner Volume – Historical Performance
Displays how often combined corners exceed each threshold, based on past matches.Season
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
| Match Corners | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| OVER 2.5 | |||
| OVER 3.5 | |||
| OVER 4.5 | |||
| OVER 5.5 | |||
| OVER 6.5 | |||
| OVER 7.5 | |||
| OVER 8.5 | |||
| OVER 9.5 | |||
| OVER 10.5 | |||
| OVER 11.5 |
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Team Discipline Profile
How often each team sees cardsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
Match Card Forecast
Expected total cards from both teamsSeason
Last 3 matches
Last 5 matches
Last 10 matches
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
/ Match
Cards Earned
/ Match
Cards Earned
Full-Time
First Half
Second Half
More stats
Team Shots
Match Shots
| Team Shots | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots / Match | 11.8 | 7.8 | 9.8 |
| Shots Conversion Rate | 6% | 9% | 7.5% |
| Shots On Target / M | 7.6 | 7.3 | 7.45 |
| Shots Off Target / M | 14.8 | 15.4 | 15.1 |
| Shots Per Goal Scored | 16.86 | 11.14 | 14 |
| Team Shots Over 10.5 | 60% | 10% | 35% |
| Team Shots Over 11.5 | 50% | 10% | 30% |
| Team Shots Over 12.5 | 40% | 10% | 25% |
| Team Shots Over 13.5 | 30% | 10% | 20% |
| Team Shots Over 14.5 | 30% | 10% | 20% |
| Team Shots Over 15.5 | 30% | 10% | 20% |
| Team Shots Over 16.5 | 30% | 10% | 20% |
| Team Shots Over 17.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Team Shots Over 18.5 | 10% | 0% | 5% |
| Team Shots On Target 3.5+ | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| Team Shots On Target 4.5+ | 20% | 10% | 15% |
| Team Shots On Target 5.5+ | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Team Shots On Target 6.5+ | 10% | 0% | 5% |
| Offside Stats | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi | Average |
| Offsides / Match | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Over 2.5 Offsides | 20% | 30% | 25% |
| Over 3.5 Offsides | 20% | 10% | 15% |
| Over 4.5 Offsides | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Misc Stats | Qingdao Red Lions | Foshan Nanshi | Average |
| Average Possession | 51.5% | 45.3% | 48.4% |
| Draw % FT | 30% | 10% | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liaoning Tieren | 21 | 71% | 48 | 21 | 27 | 50 | 3.29 |
| 2 | Chongqing Tongliangloong FC | 21 | 67% | 43 | 23 | 20 | 46 | 3.14 |
| 3 | Guangdong Guangzhou Power | 21 | 52% | 35 | 27 | 8 | 37 | 2.95 |
| 4 | Yanbian Longding | 21 | 43% | 23 | 20 | 3 | 33 | 2.05 |
| 5 | Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 21 | 38% | 30 | 24 | 6 | 32 | 2.57 |
| 6 | Dalian K’un City | 20 | 40% | 27 | 24 | 3 | 30 | 2.55 |
| 7 | Dingnan United | 20 | 35% | 28 | 25 | 3 | 29 | 2.65 |
| 8 | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 21 | 38% | 26 | 23 | 3 | 29 | 2.33 |
| 9 | Shanghai Jiading Huilong | 21 | 33% | 19 | 26 | -7 | 26 | 2.14 |
| 10 | Nanjing City | 21 | 29% | 27 | 30 | -3 | 25 | 2.71 |
| 11 | Suzhou Dongwu | 21 | 24% | 19 | 22 | -3 | 24 | 1.95 |
| 12 | Shaanxi Union | 21 | 29% | 29 | 34 | -5 | 24 | 3.00 |
| 13 | Shenzhen Juniors | 21 | 33% | 31 | 42 | -11 | 23 | 3.48 |
| 14 | Foshan Nanshi | 21 | 19% | 19 | 34 | -15 | 18 | 2.52 |
| 15 | Guangxi Pingguo FC | 21 | 19% | 16 | 30 | -14 | 17 | 2.19 |
| 16 | Qingdao Red Lions | 21 | 10% | 13 | 28 | -15 | 12 | 1.95 |